School Leaders:
How To Gain Pedagogical Influence Over Your Teachers
The Case For Leading A TEAM Professional Learning Experience
Wanting to have an impact!During my six-year stint as a Head of Department (HoD), the number one thing I wanted to achieve was to have pedagogical influence over my staff. Not that I wanted to dictate the way they should approach teaching. Instead, it would have been ideal for establishing a culture in which we all questioned the approaches we use, workshopped how to engage our students better, implemented new ideas, and shared our pedagogical wins and losses.
Of course, this never occurred. Partly this was due to a lack of time. Mostly, however, it was because I lacked the necessary credibility required to exercise pedagogical influence. Sure, I was well respected and liked as a HoD and cultivated a healthy level of cohesion in the team. BUT - and this is a big ‘BUT’ - as a HoD I was not seen as someone who had any particular pedagogical expertise to impart. I simply lacked pedagogical influence. I find this particularly ironic because having left the role as HoD I now devote all of my professional time to running pedagogically-based courses for teachers. I now have significant pedagogical influence with teachers through an online, collaborative, self-reflective, medium; one through which I rarely get to meet, in person, the participants. Compare this to when I was a HoD and physically interacting with my teachers on a daily basis! |
Get our free info
|
Why the lack of pedagogical influence?
I have spoken to other HoDs about this issue, and many concur with my experience. The common consensus appears to be: Teachers, generally, tend to lack an openness to taking pedagogical advice from their HoD.
I'm not suggesting this is an impossible task for a HoD. Indeed, some school leaders do manage to earn themselves significant pedagogical influence over their teachers. What I’m suggesting is that this is somewhat rare and primarily because of a general defensiveness of teachers, where teachers tend to hold the view:
I'm not suggesting this is an impossible task for a HoD. Indeed, some school leaders do manage to earn themselves significant pedagogical influence over their teachers. What I’m suggesting is that this is somewhat rare and primarily because of a general defensiveness of teachers, where teachers tend to hold the view:
“I'll listen to your suggestions but I'm not really open to changing because my methods work.”
The above may be a crude summary of the dynamic at play, but I'm convinced this is close to the mark. I’ll also add that this attitude is neither intentional nor necessarily conscious. Simply put, if I’m a teacher then I’m likely to have a mindset towards my HoD of “Lead me through the logistics of being a teacher in your department but don’t expect me to change the way I teach.”
However, let's be clear, I'm not referring to the leader who strives for pedagogical change through an attitude of 'We will all teach my way'. There are ways to lead teachers to the awareness that your new ideas are worth implementing!
However, let's be clear, I'm not referring to the leader who strives for pedagogical change through an attitude of 'We will all teach my way'. There are ways to lead teachers to the awareness that your new ideas are worth implementing!
The collaborative-only PD model
I am fully aware of the collaborative professional development model of 'use only the collective wisdom of the teachers to raise the standard of teaching among the collective', where the leader's role is only to facilitate.
This is all well and good, but what if, for example, within the teacher collective there isn't anyone using strategies designed, to increase student ownership over learning? Or in the mathematics context, for example, the collective wisdom is not aware of the importance of students understanding the activities they are working through for the majority of lesson time? What if the collective wisdom is only about procedural teaching, and no one is aware of approaches focused on fostering a genuine need in students to learn?
If the leader is keen for teachers to explore these and other important pedagogies, but the teachers are neither aware of these pedagogies or are not open to the leader's message, then the way forward is challenging indeed.
What I am leading to is an approach for a leader/facilitator, who desires to have teachers adopt new-to-them tried and proven pedagogies. The approach creates a situation where leaders are able to support their teachers in adopting effective pedagogies without having to negotiate the 'Don't show me how to teach' defense.
This is all well and good, but what if, for example, within the teacher collective there isn't anyone using strategies designed, to increase student ownership over learning? Or in the mathematics context, for example, the collective wisdom is not aware of the importance of students understanding the activities they are working through for the majority of lesson time? What if the collective wisdom is only about procedural teaching, and no one is aware of approaches focused on fostering a genuine need in students to learn?
If the leader is keen for teachers to explore these and other important pedagogies, but the teachers are neither aware of these pedagogies or are not open to the leader's message, then the way forward is challenging indeed.
What I am leading to is an approach for a leader/facilitator, who desires to have teachers adopt new-to-them tried and proven pedagogies. The approach creates a situation where leaders are able to support their teachers in adopting effective pedagogies without having to negotiate the 'Don't show me how to teach' defense.
An effective way forward for school leadersIf you are a school leader seeking to improve your level of pedagogical influence, then consider this suggested path from Learn Implement Share, (or from any provider offering an online, team-based course designed to create pedagogical change). Here's how it works:
|
Jeff Mills and I chat about pedagogical influence and the Team PD Model
|
- You will be the facilitator of learning (Team Leader) for your TEAM at your school. The presenter will support you in your onsite role - promoting discussion, encouraging collaboration, assisting teachers progress through the course. The better you support, encourage and facilitate the greater will be the gains made by your teachers.
- In this way you will experience significant pedagogical influence with your teachers BECAUSE the ideas will not be seen as yours. You will be facilitating the process but you will also be a participant in the course alongside your teachers. You will have pedagogical influence because you'll be leading from the side supporting your teachers with questions like "Hey Joel, how did your students take to that metacognition assignment you gave them from the course? I'm intending to run that one next week and was wondering ... " and "Lisa, I overheard you saying to Ben the other day how impressed you were with the change in your students' behaviour. Sounds awesome! I need something for my Year Nines. Which strategies do you think have been the most instrumental?" ... and so on.
But what if I don’t resonate with the principles of the course?The PL provider (should) offer the option for you to complete the course on your own before enrolling your teachers as a TEAM.
You will, naturally, be re-enrolled with your TEAM, the second time around, and at no cost. Where are TEAM opportunities provided?Learn Implement Share offers a TEAM option for all courses. As for other PL providers, you will need to ask them. I suspect, however, the team-based approach, unpacked above, is somewhat unique.
|
Team PD Testimonial Interview
Brett Donohoe explains how the TEAM approach worked for this course.
|
Subscribe to receive free tutorials, information and to stay in touch
Your comment ...
Are you a leader? Do you resonate with the message here (or not)? I'd love you to comment below. (Your email address will not be required)
