## Investigating the calculus sequence with GeoGebra

April 15th, 2017

April 15th, 2017

(The original GeoGebra file used for the dynamic image above was created by Annette Taylor, NSW, course participant, August 2009)

Many of the articles on the Learn Implement Share blog advocate the adoption of a conceptual approach by mathematics teachers, an approach which requires a significant change in pedagogy from a traditional procedurally-based approach.

The GeoGebra-based articles convey the message that a mathematics teacher, by adopting a comprehensive use of GeoGebra, is able to engineer a greater degree of conceptual understanding in students without having to change their overall approach to teaching. This is because all that is required from the teacher is to plug in a data projector and manipulate well-constructed GeoGebra files for all students to see.

This point cannot be stressed enough:

The GeoGebra-based articles convey the message that a mathematics teacher, by adopting a comprehensive use of GeoGebra, is able to engineer a greater degree of conceptual understanding in students without having to change their overall approach to teaching. This is because all that is required from the teacher is to plug in a data projector and manipulate well-constructed GeoGebra files for all students to see.

This point cannot be stressed enough:

Take a quality teacher who uses a conventional, teacher-directed, procedural approach who does not utilise dynamic geometry software - then have that teacher utilise GeoGebra proficiently by projecting quality files on a regular basis across multiple year levels and topics - and you will witness a paradigm shift in student understanding.

Note that this paradigm shift occurs WITHOUT the teacher having to change his/her approach to teaching. I say this because having mentored many teachers through the process of making tangible pedagogical changes (without technology) I know that those changes require planning, effort, risk-taking and 'the changing of one's well-established ways'. Real pedagogical change is a significant undertaking, however, the results make the journey worthwhile.

On the other hand, introducing the 'plug-in-a-data-projector-and-demonstrate' method for incorporating GeoGebra is not a confronting change to make. It does not, in my view, qualify as a change in pedagogy. The approach is still, after all, teacher-directed. And yet the upshot of 'plug-in-a-data-projector-and-demonstrate-GeoGebra' IS significant - improved engagement, many more 'aha' moments, better conceptual understanding.

THAT is a remarkable thing! Granted, to become truly effective one needs to become proficient with GeoGebra - but there's an engaging pathway for that!

Most of the GeoGebra articles on this site relate to the use of GeoGebra for junior high school levels of mathematics. This is deliberate. GeoGebra is a very powerful tool and it especially captures the imagination of teachers of senior school and university mathematics - for calculus, complex numbers, vectors and the like. In other words, the vast majority of articles and files freely available on the net are centred around these advanced math topics. I think this is the main reason why teachers whose main domain is upper primary and lower high school tend to view GeoGebra as a tool inappropriate for their purposes. It is for this reason that one intent of this site is to drive home the message that GeoGebra is a brilliant and essential tool not only for higher mathematics but EQUALLY for junior mathematics - the level of mathematics where we 'lose' so many of our students. Moreover, most math teachers are aware that GeoGebra is ideal for demonstrating the principles of geometry and number plane graphs.

On the other hand, introducing the 'plug-in-a-data-projector-and-demonstrate' method for incorporating GeoGebra is not a confronting change to make. It does not, in my view, qualify as a change in pedagogy. The approach is still, after all, teacher-directed. And yet the upshot of 'plug-in-a-data-projector-and-demonstrate-GeoGebra' IS significant - improved engagement, many more 'aha' moments, better conceptual understanding.

THAT is a remarkable thing! Granted, to become truly effective one needs to become proficient with GeoGebra - but there's an engaging pathway for that!

Most of the GeoGebra articles on this site relate to the use of GeoGebra for junior high school levels of mathematics. This is deliberate. GeoGebra is a very powerful tool and it especially captures the imagination of teachers of senior school and university mathematics - for calculus, complex numbers, vectors and the like. In other words, the vast majority of articles and files freely available on the net are centred around these advanced math topics. I think this is the main reason why teachers whose main domain is upper primary and lower high school tend to view GeoGebra as a tool inappropriate for their purposes. It is for this reason that one intent of this site is to drive home the message that GeoGebra is a brilliant and essential tool not only for higher mathematics but EQUALLY for junior mathematics - the level of mathematics where we 'lose' so many of our students. Moreover, most math teachers are aware that GeoGebra is ideal for demonstrating the principles of geometry and number plane graphs.

What is less widely known is that GeoGebra is an ideal tool for shining a light on the concepts underpinning fractions and proportion, statistics, trigonometry, Pythagoras’ theorem, all measurement formulas, the derivation of pi and more.

This article is a step away from the other GeoGebra articles because it's focus is the use of GeoGebra for teaching calculus.

Below is a re-post of an article by Kathy Tomlinson. What I find powerful throughout Kathy’s article is the strong push to have students inquire, explore, question and discover. This approach, therefore, goes well beyond the (powerfully effective) plug-in-the-data-projector-and-show-the-file method mentioned above. It is clear Kathy strives to allow students to operate as mathematicians.

The original article follows:

Below is a re-post of an article by Kathy Tomlinson. What I find powerful throughout Kathy’s article is the strong push to have students inquire, explore, question and discover. This approach, therefore, goes well beyond the (powerfully effective) plug-in-the-data-projector-and-show-the-file method mentioned above. It is clear Kathy strives to allow students to operate as mathematicians.

The original article follows:

The combination of dynamic capability and ease-of-use make GeoGebra an ideal software to support conceptual learning in the calculus sequence. In this paper I will discuss GeoGebra activities that I use with Calculus I and II students to learn basic calculus ideas with deep understanding. I have used GeoGebra activities to help students learn many topics including: the limit definition of the derivative; the fundamental theorem of calculus; the sequence of partial sums concept; ideas relating to approximate integration; and connecting polar graphs to auxiliary Cartesian graphs. The value of these activities is to help students go beyond understanding how calculus works, to developing intuition about why calculus works.

In the activity I developed for the limit definition of the derivative concept, students create their own applets at home by following six short podcasts. In their applets students create sliders, use the siders to draw dynamic secant lines, and compute the slope of their secant lines (see Figure 1).

In the activity I developed for the limit definition of the derivative concept, students create their own applets at home by following six short podcasts. In their applets students create sliders, use the siders to draw dynamic secant lines, and compute the slope of their secant lines (see Figure 1).

When teaching the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, I have discovered that it is very easy to get students to respond correctly to a question like:

However, more probing of student understanding demonstrates that students are often simply responding to the cue “find the prime of a long tall s” with the rule “replace t by x.” They aren’t necessarily understanding what is meant by an accumulation function, or that slope and area are inverse operations.

I developed a GeoGebra activity in an attempt to help students gain this understanding. Students follow a series of podcasts to create their own applet at home. Students use the “Integral” command to create a point on an accumulation function, and then use the “Trace” feature to create the accumulation function (see Figure 2). Next, students create an approximate tangent line to the accumulation function, use the “Slope” command to compute its slope and hence the derivative of the accumulation function.

I developed a GeoGebra activity in an attempt to help students gain this understanding. Students follow a series of podcasts to create their own applet at home. Students use the “Integral” command to create a point on an accumulation function, and then use the “Trace” feature to create the accumulation function (see Figure 2). Next, students create an approximate tangent line to the accumulation function, use the “Slope” command to compute its slope and hence the derivative of the accumulation function.

Finally, students create a point on the derivative of the accumulation function and use the ”Trace” feature to create the derivative of the accumulation function. In class, students make conjectures about the relationship between the original function and the derivative of the accumulation function. They explore what happens when they change the original function or the lower endpoint of the integral in their accumulation function. Eventually students discover that, independent of their function or their lower endpoint, the derivative of the accumulation function is equal to the original function, thus discovering the statement of the fundamental theorem of calculus, in a very concrete way.

Rather than simply having students learn to compute approximate integrals with the Midpoint Rule, Trapezoid Rule and Simpson’s Rule, I work to help them understand why they are getting their answers. Students bring laptops to class and use the spreadsheet in GeoGebra to compute the approximations and then they compare answers to the “true” value of the integral that GeoGebra computes with the “Integral” command ( see Figure 3). We connect the meaning of the “true” value of the integral to the area concept and discuss how this “true” value may itself be an approximation. GeoGebra’s dynamical capability allows students to change their function and compare approximations easily.

So by exploring different functions, students create conjectures about when to expect an overestimate, when to expect an underestimate and when to expect an exact value. This leads into discussion about the theory underlying each of the approximations and proofs of their conjectures. For example, students conjecture that Simpson’s Rule will always give the exact answer if the function is a second degree polynomial. This gives rise to a discussion about parabolas, Simpson’s Rule and a proof of their conjecture.

The partial sums concept is a surprisingly elusive idea for many of my Calculus II students. In the GeoGebra activity I developed for this topic, students use the spreadsheet to create the beginning terms in an original sequence and in a sequence of partial sums (see Figure 4).

Next they create a plot of both sequences, color code them to keep the idea of the original sequence separate from the idea of the partial sums sequence, and then make conjectures about the limiting behavior of each sequence. The activity helps students understand series at a deeper level as they proceed through the series testing topics that follow.

Any graphing calculator will produce the graph of a polar equation. However, by using the “Curve” command in GeoGebra students are able to see that polar equations can be thought of as parametric curves, with the angle as parameter. In the polar equation activity I designed, students use an instructor created applet to compare the so-called auxiliary Cartesian graph with the corresponding polar graph (see Figure 5). Again GeoGebra’s dynamic capability is important: a vertical vector with a point on the auxiliary curve is yoked to a radial vector with a point on the polar curve.

Students explore the connection between the graph of a polar function and its auxiliary graph by varying these yoked vectors through angles between 0 and 2pi. Students move through color-coded quadrants, using the hide/show object and color–coding feature to focus on one “quadrant” at a time. Finally, students change the function to explore what happens when r < 0 in the polar graph and y > 0 in the auxiliary graph.

Through carefully designed GeoGebra activities, using both student created and instructor created applets, students gain a more rich conceptual understanding of the limit definition of the derivative; the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus; the partial sums concept; approximate integration and graphing in polar coordinates. Students begin to bridge the gap from computational fluency to deep conceptual understanding. They are actively engaged with calculus during class time. As an added benefit, I observe that when conceptual GeoGebra activities are incorporated, students enjoy calculus more than ever.

If you'd like a copy of Kathy's calculus files which match her article, access the zip file here. (Ignore the 'No preview' warning.)

Two further articles promoting the virtues of student investigations are:

Comments anyone? We'd love your thoughts below! (Your email address will not be required)

Site Navigation

© 2017 Learn Implement Share. All rights reserved. Copyright Policy Privacy Policy Website design and development by Richard Andrew.

✕